From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. Kleinert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 19, 1924
143 N.E. 750 (N.Y. 1924)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1924

Decided February 19, 1924

Benjamin Reass, I. Henry Kutz, Hugo Hirsh and Emanuel Newman for appellant.

George P. Nicholson, Corporation Counsel ( Charles J Druhan and Joseph P. Reilly of counsel), for respondent.

James Marshall and J. George Silberstein for intervenors, respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.; CARDOZO and LEHMAN, JJ., dissent on ground that appellant is within the protection of sections 23 and 24 of the Building Zone resolution and express no opinion upon the other questions suggested in the appellant's argument. Not voting: POUND, J.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. Kleinert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 19, 1924
143 N.E. 750 (N.Y. 1924)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. Kleinert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 19, 1924

Citations

143 N.E. 750 (N.Y. 1924)
143 N.E. 750

Citing Cases

New York v. Kleinert

Held, (1) That a judgment refusing relief by mandamus was not reviewable by this Court upon the question…

State ex rel. Landis v. Valz

The doctrine that comprehensive zoning is within the constitutional scope of the police power is now well…