In Peet v. Mills, 136 P. 685, an early Washington case, a workman was injured in a train collision which occurred in a fog.
Summary of this case from Neal v. OliverOctober 16, 1951.
Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion.
In Peet v. Mills, 136 P. 685, an early Washington case, a workman was injured in a train collision which occurred in a fog.
Summary of this case from Neal v. OliverIn Peet v. Mills, 76 Wn. 437, 136 P. 685, L.R.A. 1916A, 358, Ann. Cas. 1915D 154, the plaintiff, a motorman upon an interurban railway, was injured in a collision of his train with another.
Summary of this case from Kowcun v. BybeeIn Peet v. Mills, 76 Wn. 437, 136 P. 685, Ann. Cas. 1915D, 154, L.R.A. 1916A 358, it was held that the act did not even permit an employee to sue a third party whose negligence produced the injury.
Summary of this case from Epley v. Dept. of Labor IndustriesFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ROGERS PEET COMPANY…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 16, 1951
To extend the application of the Workmen's Compensation Law to right of action of a workman against a third…
Georgia Casualty Co. v. HaygoodWithin its field of operation the Workmen's Compensation Act is the exclusive criterion of the rights and…