From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex rel. Poleti v. Poleti, Coda & Rebecchi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1920
193 App. Div. 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

November 5, 1920.

Samuel F. Frank, for the appellant.

Gustav Goodmann of counsel [ Charles Zerbarini, attorney], for the respondent.


Relator is a director in, and owner of one-third of the stock of the defendant corporation. His right to obtain the writ for the examination of the books, records and papers of the corporation has been sufficiently established by the moving papers. The right has, however, been limited by the learned court at Special Term by permitting the relator alone to make such examination, and by denying to him the right to have expert accountants or other strangers take part therein. As the relator is not familiar with bookkeeping methods, and never kept books himself, an examination would be valueless to him if he were required to conduct the same without assistance as he swears he would be unable to obtain any information therefrom. The limitation upon his right to examine was imposed because of the fact that when relator was voluntarily given, by the corporation, an opportunity to examine its books, he was accompanied not only by an accountant, but by the president and the bookkeeper of a business rival of defendant. Whereupon he was denied the inspection he desired. It would be manifestly improper to allow relator to bring with him the representatives of rivals of the defendant in the same line of business, whose inspection of the books could easily be made the means of acquiring information that might be used to impair defendant's business. On the other hand, an examination of the books would be futile, unless plaintiff were allowed the presence of an expert accountant who could understand them and intelligently make extracts therefrom.

The order appealed from will, therefore, be modified by striking out all after the word "granted," and adding thereto the following: "And that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue requiring and commanding Poleti, Coda Rebecchi, Inc., a domestic corporation, to forthwith exhibit to the relator, Joseph Poleti, and his accountant, all books of account, records and papers of said corporation of Poleti, Coda Rebecchi, Inc., from the 1st day of January, 1918, to the time of such exhibition, and to permit them to fully examine the same, and to take extracts therefrom. Such accountant shall be a certified public accountant; but there shall not be present at such examination any person connected in any way with the corporation of Mariani Bros., Inc. (except the relator);" and as so modified the order appealed from will be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.

CLARKE, P.J., SMITH, PAGE and GREENBAUM, JJ., concur.

Order of June 15, 1920, so far as it denies reargument affirmed; order of June 3, 1920, modified as directed in opinion and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.


Summaries of

People ex rel. Poleti v. Poleti, Coda & Rebecchi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1920
193 App. Div. 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

People ex rel. Poleti v. Poleti, Coda & Rebecchi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JOSEPH POLETI, Appellant, v …

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1920

Citations

193 App. Div. 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
184 N.Y.S. 168

Citing Cases

Matter of Davis v. Keilsohn Offset Co.

An examination would in many cases be valueless unless the applicant were allowed the presence of an…

Matter of Bellman v. Standard Match Co.

Even in the case of a going concern, it was held "manifestly improper to allow relator [a director] to bring…