Opinion
April, 1915.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
People ex Rel. N. Y. C. A. H. R. R.R. v. Purdy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
People ex Rel. N. Y. C. A. H. R. R.R. v. Purdy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
People ex Rel. N. Y. C. A. H. R. R.R. v. Purdy
Case Details
Full title:The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Apr 1, 1915
Citations
168 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Citing Cases
Sutton v. the State
While the general rule is that a witness cannot be corroborated by proof of previous consistent statements,…
State v. GillumIt is defined in Black's Law Dictionary, p. 267, as follows: `An unauthorized assumption and exercise of the…