From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Fennelly v. Amalgamated Copper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Summary

In People ex rel. Fennelly v. Amalgamated Copper Co. (110 App. Div. 892; affd., 184 N.Y. 573) and People ex rel. Fennelly v. United Copper Co. (110 App. Div. 892; affd., 184 N.Y. 578) orders directing a mandamus to compel inspection of the stock books were affirmed by this court and the Court of Appeals, in spite of voluminous allegations, as appears upon the inspection of the records in those cases, that the inspection was desired from selfish and improper motives.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Britton v. Am. Press Assn. No. 1

Opinion

December, 1905.


Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Fennelly v. Amalgamated Copper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

In People ex rel. Fennelly v. Amalgamated Copper Co. (110 App. Div. 892; affd., 184 N.Y. 573) and People ex rel. Fennelly v. United Copper Co. (110 App. Div. 892; affd., 184 N.Y. 578) orders directing a mandamus to compel inspection of the stock books were affirmed by this court and the Court of Appeals, in spite of voluminous allegations, as appears upon the inspection of the records in those cases, that the inspection was desired from selfish and improper motives.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Britton v. Am. Press Assn. No. 1
Case details for

People ex Rel. Fennelly v. Amalgamated Copper Co.

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Fennelly, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1905

Citations

110 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Britton v. Am. Press Assn. No. 1

* * * The motives of a stockholder in inspecting the stock book alone are immaterial. * * * It was a…

Holloway v. Thompson

dealer they were violating the act. It seems also clear that if appellees engaged others not registered as…