From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Corscadden v. Howe, JR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1903
88 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)

Opinion

November Term, 1903.


Order affirmed, without costs.


We see no ground for this appeal. The relator has acted and is acting as superintendent of the penitentiary under a salary prescribed by statute to which he is clearly entitled. He has not been removed by the commission, and if the right of the commission to remove him be assumed for the argument until he is removed he is entitled to full pay for services rendered. The order should, therefore, be affirmed, without costs. All concurred.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Corscadden v. Howe, JR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1903
88 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Case details for

People ex Rel. Corscadden v. Howe, JR

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York ex rel. John E. Corscadden…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1903

Citations

88 App. Div. 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Hansen

On the other hand, we consider the following cases authority for holding that when a title particularizes the…