From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennsylvania Rd. v. Scioto-Sandusky Conservancy District

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 1956
135 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1956)

Opinion

Nos. 34844 and 34845

Decided July 5, 1956.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Conservancy districts — Tax illegally levied and collected — Remedies — Section 2723.01 et seq., Revised Code — Class action — By taxpayer to enjoin collection of taxes — To recover taxes illegally collected — Refund denied — Waiver of objections to validity of tax — Uniform Tax Levy Law — Section 5705.01 et seq., Revised Code — Section 2, Article XII, Constitution.

APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Messrs. Porter, Stanley, Treffinger Platt, for plaintiff appellant.

Mr. Allen I. Pretzman, for appellee.

Mr. Samuel L. Devine, prosecuting attorney, Mr. J. Ralston Werum, and Mr. Earl W. Allison, for defendant appellants.


It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeals dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pennsylvania Rd. v. Scioto-Sandusky Conservancy District

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 1956
135 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1956)
Case details for

Pennsylvania Rd. v. Scioto-Sandusky Conservancy District

Case Details

Full title:THE PENNSYLVANIA RD. CO., APPELLANT v. SCIOTO-SANDUSKY CONSERVANCY…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 5, 1956

Citations

135 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1956)
135 N.E.2d 765

Citing Cases

Film Dist. Corp. v. Tracy

In our opinion, this statute applies to the fees paid by appellant and operates to exclude any recovery at…