From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penniman v. Jones

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Aug 1, 1878
58 N.H. 447 (N.H. 1878)

Summary

In Penniman v. Jones, 58 N. H. 447, the bill alleged that the plaintiffs and all of the defendants, except one Stark, had been partners; that Jones, who was manager of the firm business, had combined with Stark in certain transactions to defraud the firm.

Summary of this case from Schlioher v. Vogel

Opinion

Decided August, 1878.

When a member of a copartnership confederates with a third person to defraud the firm, the third person is properly made a defendant in a bill in equity to compel an accounting.

BILL IN EQUITY, alleging that the plaintiffs, and all the defendants except Stark, had been copartners, and that Jones, who was manager of the firm business, had combined with Stark in certain transactions to defraud the firm, and praying that Stark be compelled to account. Stark answered, denying the allegations of the bill, and moved to dismiss it as to himself. Reserved.

Wadleigh Wallace, for the plaintiffs.

Bailey, for Stark.


Jones, with whom Stark was jointly interested in the transactions complained of, was a member of the plaintiffs' firm, and could not be sued at law and be made plaintiff and defendant in the same suit. Equity was the appropriate remedy for the fraudulent alienation and conversion of the partnership funds, and Stark was properly made a defendant in the proceeding.

Motion denied.

STANLEY, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Penniman v. Jones

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Aug 1, 1878
58 N.H. 447 (N.H. 1878)

In Penniman v. Jones, 58 N. H. 447, the bill alleged that the plaintiffs and all of the defendants, except one Stark, had been partners; that Jones, who was manager of the firm business, had combined with Stark in certain transactions to defraud the firm.

Summary of this case from Schlioher v. Vogel
Case details for

Penniman v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:PENNIMAN a. v. JONES a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Aug 1, 1878

Citations

58 N.H. 447 (N.H. 1878)

Citing Cases

Schlioher v. Vogel

The weight of authority, as well as reason, seems to be, in respect to suits by and against partners, that…

Schindler v. Spackman

Koch v. Le Frois, 61 Hun, 205, 15 N.Y.S. 928. Where the suit is properly one for equitable cognizance on…