From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penner v. Central School District No. 1

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1972
40 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

November 1, 1972


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered November 10, 1971 in Montgomery County, upon a verdict rendered at Trial Term, in favor of defendant, and from an order of said court, entered November 10, 1971, which denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict. Appellant was injured while riding as a passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by respondent Filmer when it collided head on with a school bus at an intersection. The accident occurred on January 22, 1970, a bright, windy, winter morning, while the Filmer vehicle was negotiating a right-hand turn. The respective locations of the two vehicles with respect to the center line of the highway is in sharp dispute. The jury resolved this issue finding respondent Filmer negligent and awarding appellant damages against him, but exonerating respondents school district and driver Holtz. Appellant contends the admission into evidence of the report of an investigation of the accident made by the County Investigator in the Sheriff's Department was crucial on the issue of liability. In particular, she contends the investigator's designation of the point of impact in this report constitutes reversible error ( Mandzych v. Karl, 33 A.D.2d 786; Toll v. State of New York, 32 A.D.2d 47). The investigator was at the scene shortly after the happening of the accident and before either vehicle was moved. He made a number of measurements and observations and recorded them in the form of a diagram of the scene of the accident, a procedure approved by this court on another occasion ( Lee v. De Carr, 36 A.D.2d 554). While his conclusion as to the point of impact was improperly admitted as part of the report, there was sufficient other evidence, including photographs taken at the scene, to support the verdict of the jury. We find no merit to other issues raised by appellant. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Staley, Jr., J.P., Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Penner v. Central School District No. 1

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1972
40 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Penner v. Central School District No. 1

Case Details

Full title:CAROL PENNER, Appellant, v. CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE TOWNS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Wiseman v. Am. Motors Sales Corp.

Furthermore, even if Mason would not qualify as an accident reconstruction expert, his observations which led…

Soulier v. Hughes

It is of limited consequence that the skid mark was essential to calculate the speed of decedent's vehicle…