From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Montgomery

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 1988
537 A.2d 111 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1988)

Opinion

Argued December 18, 1987.

February 12, 1988.

Motor vehicles — Suspension of motor vehicle operator's license — Blood test — Operator option — Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1547.

1. A motor vehicle operator's license is properly suspended pursuant to provisions of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1547, when the licensee refuses a properly requested blood test, and nothing in the statute gives the licensee the option to choose which type of chemical test is employed. [423]

Argued December 18, 1987, before Judges DOYLE, PALLADINO, and Senior Judge KALISH, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 1117 C.D. 1986, from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Harold Montgomery, No. 84-19279.

Motor vehicle operator's license suspended by the Department of Transportation. Licensee appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. Appeal sustained. DAVENPORT, J. Department appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Reversed.

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Counsel, with him, Spencer A. Manthorpe, Chief Counsel, for appellant.

Steven M. Janove, with him, Ronald F. Kidd, Duane, Morris Heckscher, for appellee.


The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which sustained the appeal of Harold Montgomery (appellee) from the suspension of his operating privileges. We reverse the order of the court of common pleas and reinstate the suspension of appellee's operating privileges.

On October 28, 1984, police officer Joseph Conover of the Abington Township Police Department responded to a call concerning a possible drunken driver. Officer Conover, along with police officer George McReynolds, intercepted the suspect vehicle, operated by appellee, and stopped it. The officers gave appellee some field sobriety tests which he failed to perform to their satisfaction. The officers then took appellee into custody and transported him to the Abington Police Station.

Appellee agreed to submit to a breath test, but upon discovering that the Intoximeter machine was not working properly, he was told that he would be taken to a hospital for a blood test. Appellee refused to take a blood test because he said that he bleeds profusely and has a fear of needles. Officer Conover advised appellee that a refusal would result in an automatic one-year suspension of his driver's license pursuant to Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, as amended, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1547. However, appellee still refused to take a blood test.

In Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bartle, 93 Pa. Commw. 132, 500 A.2d 525 (1985), a case factually similar, we said, "There is nothing in [the act] to indicate that the driver has the option of choosing the test, although he does have the right to have his own physician administer a blood test." Id. at 134, 500 A.2d at 526.

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the court of common pleas and reinstate the suspension of appellee's operating privileges.

ORDER

NOW, February 12, 1988, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, in No. 8419279, dated March 18, 1986, is reversed, and the suspension of the operating privileges of Harold Montgomery is reinstated.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Montgomery

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 1988
537 A.2d 111 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1988)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 12, 1988

Citations

537 A.2d 111 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1988)
537 A.2d 111

Citing Cases

Poola v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Review

Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Morrow ............... 11/2/88 143 W.D. Denied 113 Pa.Cmwlth. (1988) 326, 537 A.2d…

Mooney v. Com., Dept. of Transp

Finally, Licensee asserts that the trial court erred in holding that the trooper had sole, unfettered…