From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Blum

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 1919
258 F. 901 (9th Cir. 1919)

Opinion


258 F. 901 (9th Cir. 1919) PENN MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. BLUM. No. 3241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 7, 1919

Hartman & Hartman, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff in error.

Preston, Thorgrimson & Turner and Lyons & Orton, all of Seattle, Wash., for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.

Page 902.

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This cause was tried jointly with United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blum, 258 F. 897, and by stipulation the facts of that case are to be considered herein. Inasmuch as the questions of law are also the same as in the other case, upon the authority of the decision therein, the judgment is reversed, with directions to grant a new trial.


Summaries of

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Blum

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 1919
258 F. 901 (9th Cir. 1919)
Case details for

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:PENN MUT. LIFE INS. CO. v. BLUM. [1]

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 7, 1919

Citations

258 F. 901 (9th Cir. 1919)