From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pendleton v. Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 16, 2017
No. 77 WM 2017 (Pa. Nov. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 76 WM 2017

11-16-2017

MICHAEL J. PENDLETON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Respondent


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and the Application to Expedite are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Pendleton v. Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Nov 16, 2017
No. 77 WM 2017 (Pa. Nov. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Pendleton v. Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. PENDLETON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 16, 2017

Citations

No. 77 WM 2017 (Pa. Nov. 16, 2017)