From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pena v. Graham

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 30, 2009
08 Civ. 3828 (SHS) (THK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2009)

Opinion

08 Civ. 3828 (SHS) (THK).

December 30, 2009


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated December 3, 2009, Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied and this action be dismissed. To date, no objections have been received from petitioner. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Katz's "Report and Recommendation" is adopted;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the action is dismissed;

3. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; see also Richardson v. Greene, 497 F.3d 212, 217 (2d Cir. 2007); and

4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) the Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pena v. Graham

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 30, 2009
08 Civ. 3828 (SHS) (THK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Pena v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:FERMIN PENA, Petitioner, v. H.D. GRAHAM, Superintendent, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 30, 2009

Citations

08 Civ. 3828 (SHS) (THK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Persaud v. Kirkpatrick

Accordingly, he cannot now attack the validity of the trial court's pre-plea suppression decision through a…

Musaid v. Kirkpatrick

And even if Musaid was feigning his symptoms, the feigning itself does not necessarily mean that Musaid was…