From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peer International Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc.

U.S.
Feb 19, 1991
498 U.S. 1109 (1991)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that a party has no right to a jury trial on its copyright infringement claim pursuant to Rule 55(b) or the Seventh Amendment

Summary of this case from Teri Woods Publ'g, L.L.C. v. Williams
See 6 Summaries

Opinion

No. 90-1039.

February 19, 1991.

C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to dispense with Rule 29.1 listing of class members granted. Motion of National Music Publishers' Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 909 F. 2d 1332.

Summaries of

Peer International Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc.

U.S.
Feb 19, 1991
498 U.S. 1109 (1991)

finding that a party has no right to a jury trial on its copyright infringement claim pursuant to Rule 55(b) or the Seventh Amendment

Summary of this case from Teri Woods Publ'g, L.L.C. v. Williams

rejecting contention that a discharge which violated more than one permit parameter should be counted as a single violation, and holding that violation calculations should be undertaken "on a parameter by parameter basis"; with regard to the different types of limitations, holding that each type of limit is "clearly separate" and there is "no reason why [a defendant] should not be penalized separately for violating each limitation"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.

imposing sanctions for failure to comply with FED. R. APP. P. 32

Summary of this case from Wells v. Colvin

discussing the Clean Water Act the court stated that the "likelihood may be established by showing that a defendant has 1

Summary of this case from Maine People's Alliance v. Holtrachem Mf. Co.

observing "if a plaintiff has alleged . . . that the waterway is unable to support aquatic life for example, but failed to show that defendant's effluent contains pollutants that harm aquatic life, then plaintiffs would lack standing"

Summary of this case from Fisher v. Chestnut Mountain Resort, Inc.

discussing definition of consent, with implication that in order to consent to something one must have knowledge, thereby establishing that the statute should be read disjunctively; court permits forfeiture under § 881 of apartment building used to facilitate drug dealing

Summary of this case from U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Estate
Case details for

Peer International Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PEER INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. PAUSA RECORDS, INC., ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

498 U.S. 1109 (1991)

Citing Cases

Public Int. Research v. N.J. Expressway

These assertions have not been contradicted by defendant and thus stand as undisputed facts. We find these…

U.S. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.

Although there is no Fourth Circuit precedent on this issue, see Gwaltney, 791 F.2d at 307-08 n. 8 (declining…

242 Citing Cases