From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peekskill Suburbs, Inc. v. Morabito

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1980
415 N.E.2d 983 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued October 6, 1980

Decided November 18, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE BEISHEIM, JR., J.

George Palmer Frooks and Everett Frooks for appellant.

Frank J. Ryan and Richard A. De Lorenzo for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

On this record, it cannot be said that petitioner has established a legal infirmity in the denial of the change of zoning. Nor can we conclude that the refusal to grant the change is confiscatory, especially since the property is the subject of nonconforming uses which were not alleged or shown to be without economic value.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Peekskill Suburbs, Inc. v. Morabito

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1980
415 N.E.2d 983 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Peekskill Suburbs, Inc. v. Morabito

Case Details

Full title:PEEKSKILL SUBURBS, INC., Appellant, v. MURIEL H. MORABITO et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 18, 1980

Citations

415 N.E.2d 983 (N.Y. 1980)
415 N.E.2d 983
434 N.Y.S.2d 995

Citing Cases

Professional Park v. Bedford

That does not require a showing that the property is not suitable for public or quasi-public uses permitted…

F.M.V. Realty Co. v. Vecchio

g Director that a parcel across the street from its property had been previously rezoned from neighborhood…