From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peal ex rel. Peal v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1995
340 N.C. 352 (N.C. 1995)

Opinion

No. 398PA94

Filed 2 June 1995

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 115 N.C. App. 225, 444 S.E.2d 673 (1994), affirming a judgment for plaintiff entered by Allsbrook, J., at the 22 July 1991 Special Civil Session of Superior Court, Washington County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 May 1995.

Hornthal, Riley, Ellis Maland, L.L.P., by L.P. Hornthal, Jr., M.H. Hood Ellis, and Michael P. Sanders, for plaintiff-appellee.

Maupin Taylor Ellis Adams, P.A., by James A. Roberts, III, M. Keith Kapp, and Richard N. Cook, for defendant-appellants Cianbro Corp. and Williams Bros. Constr. Co.


Justice Orr recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Peal ex rel. Peal v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1995
340 N.C. 352 (N.C. 1995)
Case details for

Peal ex rel. Peal v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:REGINA ANNETTE PEAL, Incompetent, by her General Guardian, JAMES WALTER…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1995

Citations

340 N.C. 352 (N.C. 1995)
457 S.E.2d 599

Citing Cases

Keith v. Health-Pro Home Care Servs.

Id. Plaintiffs’ additional cite in support of its position, Peal ex rel. Peal v. Smith , 115 N.C. App. 225,…

Thompson v. Wal-Mart

In general, evidence of a defendant violating its own voluntary safety standards constitutes some evidence of…