From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peake v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Mar 6, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-01998 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 6, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-01998

03-06-2018

SCOTTIE RAY PEAKE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on March 27, 2017, this action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 20) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's request for judgment on the pleadings, grant the Defendant's request for judgment on the pleadings, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by February 26, 2018.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's request for judgment on the pleadings (Document 15) be DENIED, the Defendant's request for judgment on the pleadings (Document 18) be GRANTED, the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED, and this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Eifert, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: March 6, 2018

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Peake v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Mar 6, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-01998 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Peake v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTIE RAY PEAKE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-01998 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 6, 2018)

Citing Cases

Shelby D. v. Kijakazi

As this Court has previously found, the mere fact that an individual has a prescription for a cane does not…