From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pea v. United States

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 571 (1964)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.

No. 930, Misc.

Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 116 U.S.App.D.C. 410, 324 F.2d 442.

Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr. for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome Nelson for the United States.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.


Summaries of

Pea v. United States

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 571 (1964)
Case details for

Pea v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PEA v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 22, 1964

Citations

378 U.S. 571 (1964)

Citing Cases

Wells v. United States

Id. at 389, 84 S.Ct. 1774. On the same day that it issued its decision in Jackson v. Denno, the Supreme…

State v. Ussery

On the same day Jackson v. Denno was decided the United States Supreme Court applied its new rule…