From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PAYO v. RUSTIN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1147 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2009)

Summary

denying defendant's motion for summary judgment

Summary of this case from Winston v. Bauer

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1147.

October 7, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


David Payo's Complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was received by the Clerk of Court on August 18, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report, filed on September 17, 2009, recommended that the Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants (Doc. 42) be granted with respect to Plaintiff's claim of verbal abuse, but that it be denied in all other respects. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made upon Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail at his place of incarceration. Objections were due on or before September 30, 2009, but none have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of Oct., 2009,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 42) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon (Doc. 52) is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

PAYO v. RUSTIN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-1147 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2009)

denying defendant's motion for summary judgment

Summary of this case from Winston v. Bauer
Case details for

PAYO v. RUSTIN

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PAYO, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND RUSTIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1147 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Winston v. Bauer

Lindsey contends that this case demonstrably involves the use of de minimis force, and he refers the Court to…