From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Pitkins

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 17, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-128 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-128.

June 17, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On May 27, 2008, the undersigned issued a report and recommendation recommending that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Salamae and Robinson (Doc. 11), and the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Pitkins (Doc. 15), be granted. See Report (Doc. 23). Plaintiff was given until June 10, 2011, to file objections to the report. As of the date of this writing, no objections have been filed, nor has Plaintiff moved for an extension of time in which to do so. On June 9, 2011, all parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in this case.See (Docs. 21, 22, 24). After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2011,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in light of the fact that consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge has been received by all parties, the Report of May 27, 2011 (Doc. 23), is converted to a memorandum order and constitutes the opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Salamae and Robinson (Doc. 11) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Pitkins (Doc. 15) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Payne v. Pitkins

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 17, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-128 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Payne v. Pitkins

Case Details

Full title:RONALD JOSEPH PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT PITKINS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 17, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-128 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Erdogan

Green's interpretation of this version of DC-ADM 804 appears to be widespread, as the United States Court of…