From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. McCudden

Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 9, 1970
471 P.2d 437 (Or. 1970)

Opinion

Argued May 5, 1970

Affirmed July 9, 1970

IN BANC

Appeal from Circuit Court, Deschutes County.

ROBERT H. FOLEY, Judge.

R.L. Marceau, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were L.C. Johnson and McKay, Panner, Johnson Marceau, Bend.

Ronald L. Bryant, Redmond, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Walter I. Edmonds, Jr., and Larkin Bryant, Redmond.


AFFIRMED.


Plaintiff was awarded a jury verdict for $10,000 general damages and $15,000 punitive damages for an alleged assault committed on plaintiff by defendant's agents. During the trial, defendant failed to move for a directed verdict and failed to except to any of the instructions given by the trial court and does not otherwise call to our attention any alleged errors of the trial court made at any time during the trial. Later defendant moved for a new trial on the sole ground that there was no evidence to sustain the verdict. The motion was denied. Defendant's appeal claims the trial court erred in denying its motion.

In Wills v. Petros, et al, 1960, 225 Or. 122, 357 P.2d 394, and other cases cited in that opinion we have held that "`* * * when a party having knowledge of an error or an irregularity during the trial fails to call it to the attention of the court and remains silent, speculating on the result, he is deemed to have waived the error, and the denial of a motion for a new trial upon that ground presents no reviewable question. Schafer v. Fraser, 206 Or. 446, 489-490, 290 P.2d 190, 294 P.2d 609; State v. Foot You, 24 Or. 61, 68, 32 P. 1031, 33 P. 537.'" Wills v. Petros et al, supra, at page 129.

The judgment must be affirmed.


Summaries of

Paul v. McCudden

Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 9, 1970
471 P.2d 437 (Or. 1970)
Case details for

Paul v. McCudden

Case Details

Full title:PAUL, Respondent, v. McCUDDEN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jul 9, 1970

Citations

471 P.2d 437 (Or. 1970)
471 P.2d 437

Citing Cases

Turman v. Central Billing Bureau

The denial of defendant's motion for new trial on this basis is not grounds for an assignment of error. See…

Stuart v. Kelsay

The grounds for the motion for new trial stated that the court admitted certain evidence over plaintiff's…