From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Charles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 24, 2002
816 So. 2d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D01-2249.

May 24, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Gene R. Stephenson, Judge.

Sharon Lee Stedman of Cabaniss, Smith, Toole Wiggins, P.L., Maitland, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that "[i]n appellate proceedings the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error."); Prymus v. Prymus, 753 So.2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that without a transcript or proper substitute of the final hearing below "the presumption of correctness which attaches to this final judgment remains intact and we can find no abuse of discretion in this regard.").

THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Paul v. Charles

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 24, 2002
816 So. 2d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Paul v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:JULES PAUL, Appellant, v. JENNIFER CHARLES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 24, 2002

Citations

816 So. 2d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Encarnacion v. Encarnacion

Without a transcript, in an appeal from an evidentiary hearing, this court is unable to provide an appellate…