From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Brumby

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 5, 1989
548 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-159.

September 5, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Richard Y. Feder, Judge.

Richard L. Katz, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Mark A. Cohen, and Mitchell J. Panter, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


This an appeal from an order granting final summary judgment for appellee Ed Brumby on appellant Raymond Paul's claims for conspiracy, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because we find that genuine issues of material fact remain on each of appellant's claims, precluding the entry of summary judgment, we reverse and remand this cause for further proceedings. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). Where "the existence of such issues or the possibility of their existence is reflected in the record, or the record raises even the slightest doubt in this respect, the judgment must be reversed." Braidi Trading Company v. Anthony R. Abraham Enterprises, Inc., 469 So.2d 955, 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Mejiah v. Rodriguez, 342 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).


Summaries of

Paul v. Brumby

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 5, 1989
548 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Paul v. Brumby

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND PAUL, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. ED BRUMBY, DEFENDANT/APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 5, 1989

Citations

548 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Poe & Associates, Inc. v. Estate of Vogler

Under the circumstances of this case, where the material facts were undisputed, summary judgment was…