From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chorbajian v. Pan Am World Airways, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 26, 1956
19 F.R.D. 321 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)

Opinion

         Proceeding on plaintiffs' motion for judgment on pleadings in their favor or in the alternative for partial summary judgment on limited questions of defendant's civil liability. The District Court, Sugarman, J., held that where even if plaintiffs were entitled to partial relief sought a trial of the amount of damages due each plaintiff would still have to be held and the judge presiding thereafter would be confined by the findings of fact required to be made if plaintiffs' motion were granted, no gainful result would be had in piecemeal adjudication of cause and partial summary judgment would not be substituted for pre-trial order in which adequate relief in narrowing issues could be obtained.

         Motion denied.

          Daniel Kornblum, New York City, for plaintiffs.

          Cleary, Gottlieb, Friendly & Hamilton, New York City, for defendant.


          SUGARMAN, District Judge.

         The plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the pleadings in their favor, presumably made under F.R.Civ.P. 12(c), 28 U.S.C.A. or in the alternative for partial summary judgment, presumably made under F.R.Civ.P. 56(d) (which movants have themselves variously characterized as a ‘ motion declaring the defendant's liability’ and as a quest for ‘ a definitive decision on the limited questions of civil liability’ ) is denied for the same reasons that this court denied a similar motion in United States v. Copacabana, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 17 F.R.D. 297.

          To enlarge upon what was there said, I can see no gainful result in piecemeal adjudication of this cause. Even were I to hold that plaintiffs have the partial relief sought, a trial of the amount of damages due each plaintiff would still have to be held. The judge presiding thereat should not be confined by the findings of fact which I would be required to make if this motion were granted. Such confinement would necessarily flow from the last sentence of F.R.Civ.P. 56(d).

         Adequate relief in narrowing the issues may be obtained by pre-trial. I am indisposed to substitute partial summary judgment for that process.

         It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Chorbajian v. Pan Am World Airways, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 26, 1956
19 F.R.D. 321 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)
Case details for

Chorbajian v. Pan Am World Airways, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Paul CHORBAJIAN, as President and on behalf of AOA Chapter, Flight…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 26, 1956

Citations

19 F.R.D. 321 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)

Citing Cases

Burgans v. New York Central Railroad Company

" Chorbajian v. Pan American World Airways, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 19 F.R.D. 321; United States v. Copacabana, Inc.,…