From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Nixon

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Mar 5, 2009
Case No. 4:06CV489 CDP (E.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 4:06CV489 CDP.

March 5, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner Alvin G. Patterson, Jr. The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton for a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On February 10, 2009, Judge Blanton filed his recommendation that petitioner's habeas petition should be denied. Petitioner did not object to the Report and Recommendation, and his time for doing so has now expired.

After careful consideration, I will adopt and sustain Judge Blanton's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. I have also considered whether to issue a certificate of appealability. To grant a certificate of appealability, the Court must find a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518, 522 (8th Cir. 1997). A substantial showing is a showing that issues are debatable among reasonable jurists, a court could resolve the issues differently, or the issues deserve further proceedings. Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997) (citing Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 882-83 (8th Cir. 1994)). Because petitioner has not made such a showing, I will not issue a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation filed on February 10, 2009 [#16] is adopted and sustained in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Alvin G. Patterson, Jr.'s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [#2] is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Nixon

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Mar 5, 2009
Case No. 4:06CV489 CDP (E.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Patterson v. Nixon

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN G. PATTERSON, JR., Petitioner, v. JAY NIXON, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2009

Citations

Case No. 4:06CV489 CDP (E.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Borradaile

The possession of Perfecto Armijo was not adverse in character, but was presumed to be the possession of all…

Bernhard v. Wall

The reason for the insertion of the statement in the rule that the one claiming as a bona fide purchaser must…