From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 15, 2011
No. C 11-06137 JSW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-06137 JSW

12-15-2011

ANDRE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. RACHIALLE FRANKLIN, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court has received Plaintiff's complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, both filed in this Court on December 5, 2011. The Court may authorize a plaintiff to file an action in federal court without prepayment of fees or security if the plaintiff submits an affidavit showing that he or she is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The in forma pauperis statute also provides that the Court shall dismiss the case if at any time the Court determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the action (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Plaintiff has failed to set forth "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief" as required by Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because he fails to allege that Defendant was acting on behalf of the federal or state government. See Public Utilities Comm'n of Dist. of Columbia v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451, 461 (1952) (holding that the First and Fifth Amendments "apply to and restrict only the Federal Government and not private persons."); see also West v. Adkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48-49 (1988) (holding that a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 requires a showing of constitutional violations committed by persons acting under color of state law).

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY DISMISSES the complaint with leave to amend and DENIES the application to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, he must file an amended complaint and a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis by January 3, 2012. Failure to file a cognizable legal claim by this date shall result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. The Court advises Plaintiff that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through the Court's website or in the Clerk's office. The Court also advises Plaintiff that additional assistance may be available by making an appointment with the Legal Help Center, which is located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Room 2796, San Francisco, California, 94102.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ANDRE PATTERSON, Plaintiff,

v.

RACHIALLE FRANKLIN et al, Defendant.

Case Number: CV11-06137 JSW


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on December 15, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Andre Patterson

1419 Striped Bass, #F

San Francisco, CA 94130

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Patterson v. Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 15, 2011
No. C 11-06137 JSW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Patterson v. Franklin

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. RACHIALLE FRANKLIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-06137 JSW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2011)