From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Norfolk
Nov 26, 1996
Record No. 2733-95-1 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 1996)

Opinion

Record No. 2733-95-1

November 26, 1996

Appeal from the Circuit Court of York County, Russell M. Carneal, Judge Designate.

Sydney K. L. West (Horne, West McMurtrie, P.C., on brief), for appellant.

Margaret Ann B. Walker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Overton.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.


Alvin Jerome Patterson was convicted by a jury of shooting from a vehicle in violation of § 18.2-286.1, shooting at an occupied vehicle in violation of § 18.2-154, and attempted malicious wounding in violation of § 18.2-26. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred by refusing to admit into evidence certain letters that he claims impeach a witness for the Commonwealth. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The two letters in question were written to Patterson by Cleo Harper, an eyewitness to the shooting. They were written after Patterson's arrest, and contain statements professing Harper's affection for Patterson. One letter makes reference to another woman with apparent interest in Patterson, but falls short of establishing any relationship between the two. Patterson claims that the letters show that he and Harper were in a relationship, and that Harper found out about this other woman, resulting in her motive to testify against him. The trial court's refusal to admit these letters, he argues, prevented him from properly impeaching a Commonwealth's witness.

We disagree. The letters show no real bias by Harper against Patterson. Any claim of a jealous motive is supported by neither the content of the letters nor anything else in the record. The excluded letters would therefore add nothing to the evidence presented to the jury.

Furthermore, although these two letters were not admitted, two other cards sent by Harper to Patterson were admitted. Harper also testified at trial as to her continual affection for Patterson while he was awaiting trial. Thus, if any error occurred, it was harmless.

Find no reversible error, we affirm.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Norfolk
Nov 26, 1996
Record No. 2733-95-1 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 1996)
Case details for

Patterson v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN JEROME PATTERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia. Norfolk

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

Record No. 2733-95-1 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 1996)

Citing Cases

Patterson v. Dir., Va. Dept. of Corrections

The Court of Appeals found no reversible error and affirmed the convictions. Patterson v. Commonwealth, 1996…