From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patten v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2013
CASE NO. ED CV 11-01633 DSF (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 11-01633 DSF (RZ)

11-13-2013

JASON PATTEN, Plaintiff, v. J. WALKER, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN

SECOND REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the file in this matter, and has read and reviewed the Second Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Second Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations in the Second Report, and thus

1. grants in part defendant Walker's motion to dismiss;
2. grants in part the dismissal motion by defendants Lee and Branton;
3. dismisses from the action, without prejudice (for Plaintiff's failure to accomplish service of process), defendants Clark, Brisco, Oglesby, Mixon and Lowen; and
4. dismisses the state-law-based claims from the action without prejudice. Under separate cover, the Court will enter an appropriate Judgment.

________________________

DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Patten v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2013
CASE NO. ED CV 11-01633 DSF (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Patten v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:JASON PATTEN, Plaintiff, v. J. WALKER, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 11-01633 DSF (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Patten v. Walker

Patten is warned that failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies will result in summary…