From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patron v. 112 East 111th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1961
14 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

November 9, 1961


Order, entered on June 2, 1961, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute the action, unanimously reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. No satisfactory reason was offered to justify the delay of 27 months in prosecuting the action. This inordinate delay cannot be excused because of settlement discussion. (See Krell v. Pelham Syndicate, 14 A.D.2d 845, and cases cited therein.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Patron v. 112 East 111th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1961
14 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Patron v. 112 East 111th Street Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LUCY PATRON, Respondent, v. 112 EAST 111TH STREET CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Sortino v. Fisher

That settlement negotiations have occurred between representatives for defendant and plaintiff is sometimes a…

Selwitshka v. Glens Falls Hospital

In Sortino the delay was of but 5 months — here it was of 8 months, if not of 23 — and the court said (p 29):…