From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patridge v. J.K. Harris Company

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
May 5, 2006
Case No. 05-2172 (C.D. Ill. May. 5, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-2172.

May 5, 2006


ORDER


A Report and Recommendation (#33) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on April 18, 2006. More than ten (10) days have elapsed since filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

The United States' Motion to Intervene (#17) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Patridge v. J.K. Harris Company

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
May 5, 2006
Case No. 05-2172 (C.D. Ill. May. 5, 2006)
Case details for

Patridge v. J.K. Harris Company

Case Details

Full title:DENNY PATRIDGE and JUDY PATRIDGE, Plaintiffs, v. J.K. HARRIS COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division

Date published: May 5, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-2172 (C.D. Ill. May. 5, 2006)

Citing Cases

Cabrini-Green Local Advisory Council v. Chi. Hous. Auth.

This case is unlike Patridge, in which the court denied a motion to intervene where the applicant "failed to…