From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Passafiume v. H.T. Hynds, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 3, 1942
24 A.2d 394 (N.J. 1942)

Opinion

Submitted January 20, 1942 —

Decided February 3, 1942.

The proofs examined support the findings of the two concurring tribunals that the deceased died of accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

On certiorari.

Before Justices BODINE, PERSKIE and PORTER.

For the respondent-prosecutor, John W. Taylor and Harry E. Walburg.

For the petitioner-defendant, Herman M. Wilson.


In this case, there was an award in the Bureau, affirmed in the Essex Court of Common Pleas, and Mr. Justice Parker denied certiorari. Such a result should not be lightly disturbed.

The deceased was a laborer. He was 58 1/2 years old. He had arterio-sclerosis heart disease. While engaged in overtime and extra heavy exertion, he died of coronary occlusion with thrombosis.

The proofs show that this could have been caused by the extra strain under which he was working that day. We, too, find as a fact that there was a causal relation between the extra heavy exertion occasioned by decedent's work and his death. The case clearly falls within the rule laid down in Bernstein Furniture Co. v. Kelly, 115 N.J.L. 500 ; Hentz v. Janssen Dairy Co., 122 Id. 494; Ciocca v. National Sugar Refining Co., 124 Id. 329; Molnar v. American Smelting Co., 127 Id. 118; affirmed, 128 Id. 11.

The writ is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Passafiume v. H.T. Hynds, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 3, 1942
24 A.2d 394 (N.J. 1942)
Case details for

Passafiume v. H.T. Hynds, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VINCENZA PASSAFIUME, PETITIONER-DEFENDANT, v. H.T. HYNDS, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 3, 1942

Citations

24 A.2d 394 (N.J. 1942)
24 A.2d 394

Citing Cases

Jacobs v. Kaplan

Although our courts have consistently held that if the strain or stress of work contributes to the…

Aromando v. Rubin Bros. Drug Sales Co.

The following cases all have answered the question in the affirmative, allowing recovery to the petitioner.…