From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Partridge v. McKinney

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1859
13 Cal. 158 (Cal. 1859)

Opinion


13 Cal. 158 PARTRIDGE v. McKINNEY et als. Supreme Court of California April, 1859

         Appeal from the Ninth District.

         JUDGES: On a rehearing, the following opinion was delivered by Baldwin, J. Terry, C. J. concurring.

         OPINION

          BALDWIN, Judge

         In this case a rehearing was granted. An opinion was rendered by Mr. Justice Burnett, and concurred in. We think, on a re-examination, that this opinion is correct on the proposition before the Court; but that it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the necessity of recording mining claims. That question is reserved. With this qualification, we adopt that opinion, and the result of it, as the judgment of the Court.

         Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Partridge v. McKinney

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1859
13 Cal. 158 (Cal. 1859)
Case details for

Partridge v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:PARTRIDGE v. McKINNEY et als.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1859

Citations

13 Cal. 158 (Cal. 1859)

Citing Cases

State v. McGlynn

Only after the expiration of this extended period does the right of the State begin to operate. It is…

Ricks v. Reed

The Constitution is not a grant of power or an enabling act to the Legislature, but only restrictive upon its…