From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parmley v. Norris

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
May 9, 2007
Civil No. 06-6059 (W.D. Ark. May. 9, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-6059.

May 9, 2007


ORDER


NOW on this 9th day of May 2007, comes on for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (document #14, filed April 4, 2007), and petitioner's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (document #15, filed April 18, 2007). The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows:

1. Petitioner's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the findings and recommendations contained in the Report and Recommendation and the same should be, and they hereby are, overruled.

2. The Report and Recommendation is sound in all respects both as to law and fact and should be adopted in toto. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth therein, petitioner's objections are overruled and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted in toto. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied as untimely and the same is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parmley v. Norris

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
May 9, 2007
Civil No. 06-6059 (W.D. Ark. May. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Parmley v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP EUGENE PARMLEY PETITIONER v. LARRY NORRIS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division

Date published: May 9, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-6059 (W.D. Ark. May. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wardlaw v. Cain

Likewise without merit is Wardlaw's argument that Pace does not apply to his Brady claims. Wardlaw is only…