From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Nutrisystem, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1508 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 30, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1508.

July 30, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment is DENIED;

(2) the motion of defendant NutriSystem, Inc. for summary judgment as to plaintiffs Adrian E. Parker, Donald J. Wilson, Frank L. Stephens, IV, Monica Thompson, and Senya Saunders is GRANTED; and

(3) judgment is entered in favor of defendant NutriSystem and against plaintiffs Adrian E. Parker, Donald J. Wilson, Frank L. Stephens, IV, Monica Thompson, and Senya Saunders.


Summaries of

Parker v. Nutrisystem, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1508 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Parker v. Nutrisystem, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN E. PARKER v. NUTRISYSTEM, INC

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 30, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1508 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Alvarado v. Corporate Cleaning Service

Defendants maintain that Plaintiffs' compensation is commission-based, while Plaintiffs argue that they were…

Spicer v. Pier Sixty LLC

" Erichs v. Venator Grp., Inc., 128 F. Supp. 2d 1255, 1259 (N.D. Cal. 2001). While "the case law on the…