From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Halpern-Ruder

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Sep 16, 2008
C.A. No. 07-401S (D.R.I. Sep. 16, 2008)

Summary

recognizing “practice medicine” is ambiguous and relying on Belt to determine whether a NP falls within § 541.304

Summary of this case from Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr.

Opinion

C.A. No. 07-401S.

September 16, 2008


ORDER


The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David L. Martin filed on June 27, 2008 in the above-captioned matter is accepted pursuant to Title 28 United States Code § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is DENIED and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.


Summaries of

Parker v. Halpern-Ruder

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Sep 16, 2008
C.A. No. 07-401S (D.R.I. Sep. 16, 2008)

recognizing “practice medicine” is ambiguous and relying on Belt to determine whether a NP falls within § 541.304

Summary of this case from Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr.

recognizing "practice medicine" is ambiguous and relying on Belt to determine whether a NP falls within § 541.304

Summary of this case from Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr.

considering the applicability of § 541.304 to registered nurse practitioners and holding nurse practitioners do not fall within § 541.304

Summary of this case from Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center
Case details for

Parker v. Halpern-Ruder

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen Parker Plaintiff v. Daniel Halpern-Ruder, M.D., et al. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Sep 16, 2008

Citations

C.A. No. 07-401S (D.R.I. Sep. 16, 2008)

Citing Cases

Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center

In particular, the term "other practitioners licensed and practicing in the field of medical science" is…

Cuttic v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr.

The fact that Plaintiff holds a license to practice medicine in Pennsylvania under physician supervision does…