From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker Solvents Co. v. Royal Insurance Companies of America

U.S.
Oct 7, 1991
502 U.S. 801 (1991)

Summary

holding that federal rules of appellate procedure allow a district court judge to amend its ruling to add a § 1292(b) certification

Summary of this case from Boyer v. Gildea

Opinion

No. 90-1936.

October 7, 1991.


C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Salve Regina College v. Russell, 499 U. S. 225 (1991). Reported below: 938 F. 2d 185.


Summaries of

Parker Solvents Co. v. Royal Insurance Companies of America

U.S.
Oct 7, 1991
502 U.S. 801 (1991)

holding that federal rules of appellate procedure allow a district court judge to amend its ruling to add a § 1292(b) certification

Summary of this case from Boyer v. Gildea

holding that federal rules of appellate procedure allow a district court judge to amend its ruling to add a § 1292(b) certification

Summary of this case from Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Estate of Zinsmaster

explaining that the “relevant inquiry in any subdelegation challenge is whether Congress intended to permit the delegate to subdelegate the authority conferred by Congress” and that language in the statute at issue allowing the Attorney General to authorize staff to carry out his duties implied such an intent

Summary of this case from Kobach v. U.S. Election Assistance Comm'n
Case details for

Parker Solvents Co. v. Royal Insurance Companies of America

Case Details

Full title:PARKER SOLVENTS CO., INC. v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANIES OF AMERICA…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 7, 1991

Citations

502 U.S. 801 (1991)

Citing Cases

Pelman v. McDonald's Corporation

In duty to warn cases, New York recognizes two circumstances that would preclude a finding of proximate…

Lawyers Title Insurance v. Dearborn Title Corp.

This is not a case in which the facts underlying the retained and the appealed claims are the same, and the…