From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker Plumbing Heating Company v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 14, 1969
225 Ga. 31 (Ga. 1969)

Opinion

24830.

ARGUED DECEMBER 10, 1968.

DECIDED JANUARY 14, 1969.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 118 Ga. App. 130 ( 162 S.E.2d 755).

Hurt, Hill Richardson, James C. Hill, Arnold Wright, Jr., for appellant.

Woodruff, Savell, Lane Williams, Lawson A. Cox, Henry Angel, for appellee.


Certiorari was granted to the Court of Appeals in the present case to correct the holding that the agreement executed by the insured and set out in detail in the opinion of the Court of Appeals ( Kurtz v. Parker Plumbing Heating Co., 118 Ga. App. 130 ( 162 S.E.2d 755)), was not an assignment of the cause of action.

The agreement which embodied more than a mere assignment of the cause of action was still an assignment of such cause of action, and the assignee must bring the action in its name. See Sullivan v. Curling, 149 Ga. 96, 101 ( 99 S.E. 533, 5 ALR 124). Therefore, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the grant of the summary judgment for the defendant where the undisputed proof showed that the plaintiff no longer had any interest in the cause of action.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED DECEMBER 10, 1968 — DECIDED JANUARY 14, 1969.


Summaries of

Parker Plumbing Heating Company v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 14, 1969
225 Ga. 31 (Ga. 1969)
Case details for

Parker Plumbing Heating Company v. Kurtz

Case Details

Full title:PARKER PLUMBING HEATING COMPANY v. KURTZ

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 14, 1969

Citations

225 Ga. 31 (Ga. 1969)
165 S.E.2d 729

Citing Cases

Employers' Liability v. Keelin

1. Was there error as to appellant Lockhart? In the light of Parker Plumbing Heating Co. v. Kurtz, 225 Ga.…

Webb v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

Contrary to the majority's analysis of Lindsey, it is the Supreme Court's ruling in Lindsey, and not this…