From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pargament v. Fitzgerald

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 18, 1968
391 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 352, Docket 31711.

Argued March 18, 1968.

Decided March 18, 1968.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles H. Tenney, J., dismissing the complaint and denying appellant's motion for summary judgment. 272 F. Supp. 553 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).

Robert Barko, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Yale L. Rosenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., Grant B. Hering, Asst. U.S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, on the brief), for defendant-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge, and CLARIE, District Judge.

Of the District Court of Connecticut, sitting by designation.


We affirm in open court the judgment of the Southern District which dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for the reasons stated in Judge Tenney's opinion at 272 F. Supp. 553 (1967), as the district court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter.


Summaries of

Pargament v. Fitzgerald

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 18, 1968
391 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Pargament v. Fitzgerald

Case Details

Full title:Harry PARGAMENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. FITZGERALD, Jr., as…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 1968

Citations

391 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Hammond v. United States

The extent of the Government's consent to be sued under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 is jurisdictional and where there…