From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paren v. Craigie

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Jun 15, 2006
Civil Action: 04-30127-MAP (D. Mass. Jun. 15, 2006)

Summary

noting that "courts applying Massachusetts law have routinely rejected claims of defamation based upon internal business communications"

Summary of this case from Sovie v. Town of North Andover

Opinion

Civil Action: 04-30127-MAP.

June 15, 2006


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE


Jury Verdict. This action came before the court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by the Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

JUDGMENT entered for the Defendants pursuant to the Memorandum and Order of the Court entered this date granting the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.


Summaries of

Paren v. Craigie

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Jun 15, 2006
Civil Action: 04-30127-MAP (D. Mass. Jun. 15, 2006)

noting that "courts applying Massachusetts law have routinely rejected claims of defamation based upon internal business communications"

Summary of this case from Sovie v. Town of North Andover
Case details for

Paren v. Craigie

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS PAREN, Plaintiff(s) v. JAMES CRAIGIE and DANIEL FREY, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Jun 15, 2006

Citations

Civil Action: 04-30127-MAP (D. Mass. Jun. 15, 2006)

Citing Cases

Sovie v. Town of North Andover

Because the memorandum was made in connection with Sovie's termination, it easily qualifies as a publication…