Opinion
April 8, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Upon a motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) based upon the convenience of witnesses, the movant must establish the identity of the witnesses who allegedly will be inconvenienced, their willingness to testify, and the nature of their anticipated testimony (see, Alexandre v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 150 A.D.2d 742, 743; Jansen v. Bernhang, 149 A.D.2d 468, 469; Greene v. Hillcrest Gen. Hosp., 130 A.D.2d 621). Apart from identifying two witnesses, the appellant complied with none of the other requirements, and so failed to satisfy his burden. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.