From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pannizzo v. Lauro

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 6, 1955
228 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 99, Docket 23688.

Submitted November 7, 1955.

Decided December 6, 1955.

Gray Wythe, New York City (Horace M. Gray, New York City, of counsel), for garnishee-appellant.

Arkin Kottler, New York City (Edward Arkin, New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


The order of the district court here attempted to be brought before us allowed the case, with its clause for foreign attachment, to proceed, but settled no rights or liabilities of the parties. Hence it is not presently appealable. See Petition of Wills Lines, Inc., 2 Cir., 227 F.2d 509, and cases cited, interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 1292(3).

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Pannizzo v. Lauro

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 6, 1955
228 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Pannizzo v. Lauro

Case Details

Full title:Pietro PANNIZZO, Administrator of the Estate of Anna Pannizzo, Deceased…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1955

Citations

228 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

Hadjipateras v. Pacifica, S.A

On several theories the application is timely and the desirability of an appeal sufficiently certified. Since…

Eagle of Gloucester, Inc. v. Consol. Fisheries

The present statute has been given the same construction in the following cases: Rogers v. Alaska Steamship…