From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 1944
268 App. Div. 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

December 29, 1944.

Appeal from Broome County.


This is a matrimonial action for a separation on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The answer denies such conduct and sets up a counterclaim for a separation on the same ground. The summons was served personally upon the defendant in the State of New York on June 7, 1944, and he thereafter appeared and answered. On July 1, 1944, defendant left the State and took up a temporary residence in Pennsylvania. From there he went to Nevada and claims that on July 13, 1944, he began a residence in that State and has since been domiciled there continuously. On August 26, 1944, he began an action against plaintiff in the State of Nevada for divorce and the process in that action was served upon the plaintiff by publication and by personal service within the State of New York only. In September, 1944, plaintiff moved in her separation action to enjoin defendant from prosecuting the Nevada divorce action. The motion papers were served upon the defendant's attorney after defendant's Nevada residence became complete. Special Term granted the motion. Under subdivision 1 of section 878 of the Civil Practice Act an injunction order may be granted where it appears that a defendant, during the pendency of the action, is about to do something which will render the judgment ineffectual. In this action the New York court has jurisdiction of the defendant personally as well as of the marital status of the parties, who were married in the State of New York and both of whom were domiciled in the State of New York at the time of the commencement of the action. Under these circumstances the defendant cannot deprive this court of jurisdiction by removing from the State. We are not called upon to decide the validity in New York of the Nevada divorce should one be granted. Sufficient for this decision is the fact that the defendant is attempting to render the judgment of separation ineffectual. Motion for stay denied, without costs. Order affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. [See post, p. 1076.]


Summaries of

Palmer v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 1944
268 App. Div. 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Palmer v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:MARY J. PALMER, Respondent, v. RAY E. PALMER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Garvin v. Garvin

separation action, and until entry of final judgment herein, from proceeding with the prosecution of an…

Pereira v. Pereira

We are aware of numerous rulings to this effect at Special Term in this and other departments of the Supreme…