From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1979
390 N.E.2d 1177 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued March 28, 1979

Decided April 26, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Alan J. Saks and Ann Thacher Anderson for appellant. Donald B. Frederick for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board reinstated, and the petition for enforcement granted.

In this proceeding petitioners challenge a finding of the Human Rights Appeal Board that they engaged in unlawful racial discrimination. The Appellate Division, upon review of the record, found the decision of the board unsupported by substantial evidence. We disagree with this conclusion.

Complainant's testimony, if credited by the board, establishes that the refusal of the trailer park owners to consummate the trailer transaction with him was motivated by racial bias — a distaste for an interracial relationship. Indeed, complainant related that one of the owners had made racially disparaging statements and had expressly refused to close the deal due to racial consideration. Inasmuch as the board was free to accept this evidence, as it obviously chose to do, we cannot say that the record as a whole lacks substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176).

We likewise are unable to disturb the award of damages to complainant for the mental anguish he suffered. On the present record the board could have concluded that race-related comments concerning complainant were uttered in the presence of petitioners' employees, causing complainant humiliation and ultimately leading to his treatment by a physician. In view of the circumstances and the important public policy to be served in these cases, the award of damages must stand (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, supra, at p 184).

We have examined and considered petitioners' remaining contentions, and conclude they lack merit.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Palmer v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1979
390 N.E.2d 1177 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Palmer v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE N. PALMER et al., Doing Business as PALMER MOBILE HOMES, INC., et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1979

Citations

390 N.E.2d 1177 (N.Y. 1979)
390 N.E.2d 1177
417 N.Y.S.2d 253

Citing Cases

Dunn v. Fishbein

The statute is to be "construed liberally for the accomplishment of the purposes thereof" (Executive Law §…