From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Mayer

Appellate Court of Illinois
Feb 26, 1947
330 Ill. App. 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,725. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 26, 1947 Rehearing denied March 12, 1947 Released for publication March 20, 1947

CONTRACTS, § 148courts as refusing to aid either party to unlawful contract. In damage action for breach of written contract, judgment would be entered for defendant where it appeared that contract was unlawful undertaking known by both parties to be in violation of Emergency Price Control Act and Regulations relating to sugar, since courts refuse to aid either party to unlawful contract, which rule is made for protection of public and not for benefit of parties.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. STANLEY H. KLARKOWSKI, Judge, presiding.

Judgment reversed and judgment here for defendant and against plaintiff. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the April term, 1946.

Bernard P. Barasa, for appellant;

Ode L. Rankin, of counsel;

David Alswang and Melbourne A. Chapp, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 26, 1947; rehearing denied March 12, 1947; released for publication March 20, 1947.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Mayer

Appellate Court of Illinois
Feb 26, 1947
330 Ill. App. 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Palmer v. Mayer

Case Details

Full title:Charles M. Palmer, Appellee, v. Frank X. Mayer, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Feb 26, 1947

Citations

330 Ill. App. 619 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
71 N.E.2d 822

Citing Cases

Dippel et al. v. Brunozzi

to compel the other to do as much . . . . If the contract is still executory, the promisor is left…

Bromberg v. Moul

Brown Rubin, The Effect of Wartime Price Controls on Contracts for the Sale of Goods, 52 Yale L.J. 74, 87-92…