From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Far West Collection Services, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 18, 2008
No. C-04-03027 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2008)

Summary

awarding fees in successful FDCPA action at rates of $325 and $465 per hour

Summary of this case from Alvarado v. HOVG, LLC

Opinion

No. C-04-03027 RMW.

December 18, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS [Re Docket No. 177]


The court approved a final settlement between the parties on August 12, 2008. Plaintiff Susanne Palmer ("Palmer") now moves for attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692(k). Because attorneys fees were incorporated into the settlement class fund, defendant Far West Collection Services, Inc. ("Far West") does not oppose the instant motion. For the reasons stated below, the court grants Palmer's motion for fees.

Plaintiff filed this class action lawsuit in July of 2004, alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq., and the California Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"), Cal. Bus. Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. Over the next two years the parties briefed and argued a motion to dismiss, two motions for reconsideration, and a variety of class-certification issues. On September 14, 2006, the court certified plaintiffs' class against Far West. After some dispute about class notice, and difficulties in collecting accurate class information, the parties submitted a motion for preliminary settlement approval in January of 2008. The court approved class notice and preliminarily approved the settlement on April 19, 2008. The court finally approved the class settlement on August 12, 2008. Plaintiffs filed the instant motion for fees, which defendants do not oppose, on November 7, 2008. Plaintiffs provide the following hours breakdown in their motion for fees: Attorney Total Compensable Hours Hourly Rate Total Compensation Total Attorney Fees $85,999.95

O. Randolph Bragg 23.31 $465 $10,839.15 Paul Arons 129.51 $425 $55,041.75 Ronald Wilcox 56.16 $325 $18,252.00 Craig Shapiro 6.93 $225 $1,559.25 Adam M. Mergenthaler 0.9 $225 $202.50 James M. Smith 4.68 $225 $105.30 Under the settlement agreement defendants paid $66,518.38 into a trust account. As part of the settlement, plaintiffs have agreed to cap the award of attorneys fees and costs at $52,000. Plaintiffs here seek that amount. The fees and costs requested do not adversely impact recovery for plaintiffs.

In a successful action under the FDCPA, the award of attorneys fees to the plaintiff is mandatory. 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3); Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, 523 F.3d 973, 978 (9th Cir. 2008). In making such an award, the court should use the lodestar method, multiplying a reasonable expenditure of time by a reasonable rate to reach what is, presumptively, a reasonable award. Id.

In support of their motion for fees, plaintiffs' counsel O. Randolph Bragg, Paul Arons, and Ronald Wilcox have submitted itemized statements describing the time expended on the action and the services rendered. Wilcox Decl., Ex. 1; Bragg Decl., Ex. 1; Arons Decl. Ex. 1. The court is satisfied that counsel's motion for fees reasonably reflect the hours spent in rendering services for the class. The court further finds that $465 an hour for Mr. Bragg, $425 an hour for Mr. Arons, and $325 an hour for Mr. Wilcox are reasonable rates for attorneys with their equivalent years of experience and specifically handling FDCPA cases or other debtor/creditor disputes.

III. ORDER

For the foregoing reasons, the court grants plaintiffs' motion for attorneys fees and costs.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Far West Collection Services, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 18, 2008
No. C-04-03027 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2008)

awarding fees in successful FDCPA action at rates of $325 and $465 per hour

Summary of this case from Alvarado v. HOVG, LLC

awarding attorneys' fees in a successful FDCPA action for three attorneys at rates of $325 and $465 per hour

Summary of this case from Young v. Law Offices of Herbert Davis

awarding fees in successful FDCPA action for Mr. Wilcox and two other attorneys at rates of $325 and $465 per hour

Summary of this case from De Amaral v. Goldsmith & Hull

awarding fees in successful FDCPA action for three attorneys at rates of $325 and $465 per hour

Summary of this case from Rivera v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC
Case details for

Palmer v. Far West Collection Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUSANNE M. PALMER, On Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 18, 2008

Citations

No. C-04-03027 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2008)

Citing Cases

Young v. Law Offices of Herbert Davis

The Court finds that the number of hours worked by plaintiffs' counsel on the case is reasonable.…

Schuchardt v. Law Office of Rory W. Clark

Moreover, another case in this District that Plaintiffs did not cite also supports their fee request. See,…