From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-820 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2010)

Summary

finding that 114 days did not present a borderline age situation

Summary of this case from Vaughn v. Astrue

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-820.

March 31, 2010.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2010, after consideration of the pleadings and record and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David Strawbridge, and Plaintiff's objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and all of Plaintiff's objections thereto are DENIED.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-820 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2010)

finding that 114 days did not present a borderline age situation

Summary of this case from Vaughn v. Astrue
Case details for

Palmer v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL PALMER v. MICHAEL ASTRUE Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-820 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2010)

Citing Cases

Zukina v. Berryhill

8 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Courts in this circuit have held that if a plaintiff's…

Vaughn v. Astrue

District courts within this circuit have reached different conclusions as to whether the time frame in this…