From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paletti v. Cromer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 1, 2021
326 So. 3d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1031

07-01-2021

Timothy M. PALETTI and the Preece/Paletti Family Foundation, Inc., Appellants, v. Charles J. CROMER, Appellee.

Timothy M. Paletti, pro se, Appellant. Robert J. Powell of Moorhead Law Group, LLC, Pensacola, for Appellee.


Timothy M. Paletti, pro se, Appellant.

Robert J. Powell of Moorhead Law Group, LLC, Pensacola, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See City of Miami v. Steckloff , 111 So. 2d 446, 447 (Fla. 1959) ("[P]oints covered by a decree of the trial court will not be considered by an appellate court unless they are properly raised and discussed in the briefs."); Doe v. Baptist Primary Care, Inc. , 177 So. 3d 669, 673 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (explaining that an appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court's ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue).

Rowe, C.J., and Roberts and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Paletti v. Cromer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 1, 2021
326 So. 3d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Paletti v. Cromer

Case Details

Full title:Timothy M. PALETTI and the Preece/Paletti Family Foundation, Inc.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

326 So. 3d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)