From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1948
273 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

February 2, 1948.


Action on an insurance policy to recover a loss due to malicious mischief. Order denying defendant insurer's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is barred because of the failure of plaintiffs to commence the action within twelve months after the happening of the loss, according to the terms of the policy, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Defendant rejected the claim, at the latest, approximately one and one-half months before the expiration of the twelve-month period. No prejudice to plaintiffs resulted which could lead to a meritorious claim of waiver or estoppel. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1948
273 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PALAZZOLA et al., Doing Business as LAKEVIEW CONTRACTING CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Skylark Enterprises Inc. v. Am. Cent. Ins. Co.

The motion for summary judgment was made on the ground that the action was not timely commenced. In our…

Fotochrome, Inc. v. American Insurance Company

There is no indication that plaintiff was misled or lulled into inactivity by the defendant's conduct. It…