From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paige v. White Plains Urban Renewal Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1976
51 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 2, 1976


In an action inter alia to declare the rights of the parties with respect to the condemnation of certain property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 19, 1971, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The doctrine of res judicata bars litigation in the present action of issues which were previously determined or which could have been determined in the prior condemnation proceeding since "the two causes of action have such a measure of identity that a different judgment in the second would destroy or impair rights or interests established by the first" (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N.Y. 304, 307). Cohalan, Acting P.J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Paige v. White Plains Urban Renewal Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1976
51 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Paige v. White Plains Urban Renewal Agency

Case Details

Full title:ERIC H. PAIGE, Doing Business as SECOND YORK CO., Appellant, v. WHITE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Winters v. Lavine

For instance, under the New York concept of res judicata a prior judgment is conclusive upon the parties in…

Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Telephone Corp.

c, par 5011.09), absolute and entire consistency in the allegations of a complaint is not required.…