From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 7, 1987
361 S.E.2d 153 (Ga. 1987)

Opinion

44876.

DECIDED OCTOBER 7, 1987. RECONSIDERATION DENIED OCTOBER 28, 1987.

Denial of double jeopardy. Jackson Superior Court. Before Judge McWhorter.

Walter B. Harvey, Janet Gail Hearn, for appellant.

Timothy G. Madison, District Attorney, Deborah L. Wilbanks, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, for appellee.


Jerry Homer Page was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. His death sentence was reversed on appeal to this court because of an inadequate verdict by the jury. Page v. State, 256 Ga. 191 ( 345 S.E.2d 600) (1986). After the state reasserted its intention to seek the death penalty, he filed this plea of former jeopardy, which the trial court denied. He appeals. We affirm.

The jury, at Page's sentencing trial, returned a verdict in the form of the District Attorney's notice of intent to seek the death penalty. Because the notice was returned verbatim, it was uncertain whether the jury realized that it was to make an independent determination whether any aggravating circumstances existed, and if it did, it also failed to choose between the two alternatives presented to it by the court. However, it was clear that the jury intended to find an aggravating circumstance and to recommend the death penalty. Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 618 ( 284 S.E.2d 422) (1981); Zant v. Redd, 249 Ga. 211 ( 290 S.E.2d 36) (1982). Furthermore, the evidence supported that verdict.

"We find the following statutory aggravating circumstances: Notice of Intent to Seek Death Penalty Comes now the District Attorney and files this his notice to seek the death penalty pursuant to O.C.G.A. 17-10-30 and will show the following circumstances: In that the murder was committed while the offender was engaged in the commission of another Capital felony to wit: Murder or Aggravated battery upon another victim."

Page argues here that the trial court's acceptance of a legally insufficient verdict constituted an acquittal, citing several cases including Cross v. State, 124 Ga. App. 152 ( 183 S.E.2d 93) (1971) and Couch v. State, 28 Ga. 367 (1859), and that thereafter the death penalty may not be reimposed. Arizona v. Rumsey, 467 U.S. 203 ( 104 S.C. 2305, 81 L.Ed.2d 164) (1984); Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430 ( 101 S.C. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270) (1981). Unlike Cross and Couch, the verdict here was not a mere nullity, and Page's assertion that the verdict was void in its entirety was resolved adversely to him in our previous decision. We also reaffirm our holding there that "since the evidence is `amply sufficient to warrant capital punishment ..., the state is not prohibited from seeking anew the death penalty.'" Page v. State, supra at p. 194; Crawford v. State, 256 Ga. 57, 58 ( 344 S.E.2d 215) (1986). The trial court properly rejected the plea of former jeopardy.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 7, 1987 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED OCTOBER 28, 1987.


Summaries of

Page v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 7, 1987
361 S.E.2d 153 (Ga. 1987)
Case details for

Page v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAGE v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 7, 1987

Citations

361 S.E.2d 153 (Ga. 1987)
361 S.E.2d 153

Citing Cases

Morgan v. State

However, this argument has been decided adversely to the defendant by the United States Supreme Court in…

Jarrell v. State

Since the evidence is sufficient to support proper § b (2) and § b (7) findings, the state may again seek a…